| If
you've been following the news about home schooling, you know that there's
only one thing more scary for a liberal to contend with than a
well-educated, home-schooled, conservative Christian--an entire college
full of them being trained to hold high government office!
This week's Associated
Press news story (Thursday, September 28, 2000) announces the
liberals' most-dreaded nightmare:
PURCELLVILLE, Va. (AP) - The nation's first
college for students who were schooled at home is not what you would
call a party school.
The 90 students who will begin classes
Monday at the new Patrick
Henry College can expect coursework with a Christian perspective,
mandatory morning chapel services and a requirement to show ``evidence
of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.'' Men and women won't be
permitted in each other's dorm rooms.
``It'll be a refuge from sex, drugs and rock
and roll. Well, at least sex and drugs,'' said founder Michael Farris.
Farris' home schooling association estimates
more than 1.5 million children are taught at home by their parents, and
the number increases by 15 percent a year.
According to Farris, the average combined
SAT score at Patrick Henry is above 1,200 out of a possible 1,600, and
students have turned down Georgetown, William and Mary and other top
schools to come to the college, which is in Virginia's Loudoun County
about 35 miles from Washington.
``The only thing different is you don't have
to dumb down the vocabulary when you're teaching home-schooled kids,''
said Farris, a Republican nominee for lieutenant governor in 1993 and
founder of the Home School Legal Defense Association.
Joanna Kurlowich of Columbia, S.C., said she
chose Patrick Henry so that she won't have to spend her time defending
her Christian beliefs to skeptical professors.
``If a professor had conflicting beliefs, I
would be forced to spend a significant amount of time defending my own
beliefs instead of learning,'' she said. ``I want to learn, come out
strong and ready to stand up for my beliefs.''
What's most scary for liberals is the clear
objective of the college, as explained in this Sunday, September 26, 1999 article
in the Washington Post:
But Farris does not envision the school as a
plastic bubble protecting students from the outside world--far from it.
As he imagines it, the secluded campus will act as a training ground for
the future Christian vanguard. Just as the Highlander Folk School turned
out civil rights activists like Rosa Parks in the 1960s, Patrick Henry
will prepare the next generation of young Christian agitators. [Christian
agitators? Well, I guess from the vantage point of
this liberal journalist, Hanna Rosin, of the Washington Post]
Pamphlets lay out the school's mission
bluntly: All the students will be government majors, striving to
"transform America" by finding high-level staff positions in
government as a preparation to run for office. "PHC
graduates," one brochure boasts, "will eventually hold some of
the highest offices in the land."
Patrick Henry's emphasis on training future
activists and politicians will set it apart from other Christian
colleges. The school plans to resurrect an old apprenticeship model of
teaching, where students work one on one with teachers to learn
practical real-world experience. Its student body will be limited to
200, with at least 10 full-time teachers, each one a model of Christian
living.
"It's more personal," said Jacob.
"Instead of just book knowledge, we'll give them wisdom and
experience so they'll be ready to hit the ground running, go into a job
and do it from day one."
Looks like the heat on the culture war
has been turned up a few notches, uh?
In case you haven't noticed, liberals have been
berating home schooling since it's most recent resurgence in the late 20th
Century. Certainly it's obvious why the liberals despise home
schooling--because it's working to counteract the society that the
liberals are trying to perpetuate. The AP
story says it this way:
Many home-schooled youngsters are from
fundamentalist Christian families who believe the [public] schools are
not inculcating morals. Other parents -- some of them high academic
achievers themselves -- cite dissatisfaction with the quality of public
education and worries about violence and drugs.
Get a load of how the Boston Globe presents
this Patrick Henry College story in the worst possible light, in this article
by Anne E. Kornblut (12/14/1999):
That makes them [home schoolers] graduates of
one of the most controversial movements in American education, one that
gained steam in the 1980s amid a series of legal battles pitting parents
against the government. Now that the first wave of the country's 1.5
million home-schooled children is reaching college age, there is a new
debate: When, and how, should they be thrust into the "real
world"?
Critics of home-schooling have long argued
that children need exposure to the outside world and peers to grow into
well-rounded adults. And home-schoolers freely admit their aim is to
"let children be children" by sheltering them from the harsh
realities and temptations of the modern world. But when do children stop
being children? How do they make that transition? And what kind of adult
lives will home-schooled children be prepared to lead?
This intertwining of politics and
home-schooled students is bound to draw notice, especially since the
home-schooling movement is so often depicted as antigovernment. In the
last 19 years advocates for home schooling have filed hundreds of
lawsuits in more than 40 states, according to the Home School Legal
Defense Association. The purpose of the litigation, in most cases, has
been to get government out of citizens' educational lives.
But to Farris and his colleagues, the vision
is entirely consistent. Patrick Henry College will be a breeding ground
for the next generation of crusaders -- who may abstain from partying
with the rest of the world, but will still work to change it. The
school's promotional material states the goal: "Eventually, these
highly-qualified public servants will themselves begin to run for
elective office and will have the opportunity to lead our nation back to
its constitutional roots."
Those roots do not exclude religion, in
Farris's view, and fundamentalist Christianity is clearly at the core of
what the college hopes to stand for. Students will attend daily chapel.
They must "show evidence of a personal relationship with Jesus
Christ," the school pamphlet says, and must subscribe to a
seven-point statement of faith that includes believing in the literal
resurrection of Christ. Emblazoned on the blue-and-white folders being
distributed to prospective students is a school motto: "For Christ
& For Liberty."
So what's the threat of home schoolers to the
liberals? Name any characteristic of the home schooling movement,
and you'll have the list of threats to liberalism. Even though the
liberals feel threatened by these conservatives because of their armaments
to fight the cultural war, I think what really gets under the skin of the
liberals is the shunning of the morally-deprived societal habits, as
demonstrated by the liberal journalists. Continuing from the Boston
Globe:
. . . Patrick Henry College already has a few
rules: Students will wear uniforms. They won't drink. They won't date
unless their parents "are informed of the potential romance"
and approve.
Farris's vision for student relationships
also is closely tied to faith. He hopes to develop a "practice of
courtship," in which students "engage in the activity of
seriously looking for God's partner in life." Students who find
themselves attracted to one another will be required to call their
parents to discuss it. The role of parents, Farris said, is "to
help them make a wise choice of whether they will marry."
Obviously the above was written with the intent of making
fun of the Christian beliefs of Farris and his constituents.
However, just to demonstrate that even liberals
should not make rash generalizations about those with whom they disagree,
here are three
"letters to the editor" response to the above Boston
Globe article:
Dear Editor,
Your recent article, "New college
eyeing political lives for the home-schooled" (12/14/99) wrongly
implies that homeschoolers, in general, agree with Michael Farris'
educational and political views. A large segment of today's
homeschoolers choose home education not for religious or political
reasons, but because homeschooling offers a rich and varied educational
experience. Rather than hiding from reality, as you indicated, these
families homeschool so that their children can experience more real
world learning through internships, community service, travel and other
activities that are limited within the confines of a school's four
walls. In fact, many homeschool families facilitate their children's
education by providing access to a multitude of people, perspectives and
worldviews.
Dear Editor,
Anne Kornblut's sweeping generalizations
about homeschoolers ("New College eyeing political lives for the
home-schooled" p. 1, 12/14/99) shows sloppy research. All the
issues she raises by unnamed critics, particularly that homeschoolers
are deliberate isolationists, may apply to some, but hardly to all. The
questions she asks, "How do they make that transition [into the
world outside their home]? And what kind of adult lives will
home-schooled children be prepared to lead?" have been answered by
research and adults who were homeschooled themselves for some time now.
Research, case histories, and anecdotal evidence exists for all the
questions above, and lists of famous homeschoolers, grown-up
homeschoolers willing to speak about being adults who were homeschooled,
and colleges and universities that have accepted homeschoolers, are
readily available. My company, which is nonsectarian and advocates
homeschooling as a way to involve children in the world rather than
isolate them in homes or schools, publishes such information, and has
done so since 1977. These lists include scientists, athletes, artists,
politicians, business people, etc., all of whom were homeschooled for
all or part of their childhood. They are not social illiterates, nor are
they all right-wing conservatives. Homeschoolers have been getting into
Ivy League Universities and other colleges and we - and even the Boston
Globe - report it (for instance, see the recent Globe article about the
author Jedidiah Purdy, who was homeschooled ). Homeschoolers also find
work worth doing without conventional high school or college degrees.
The Globe needs to be more aware of the
history of homeschooling: while there are 1.5 million homeschooled
children in America now, a large number of homeschooled children passed
into adulthood in the eighties, making the nineties the "second
wave," not the first wave as the article says, of homeschoolers to
attend college and/or enter the workplace. Most importantly,
homeschooling is a very diverse movement that includes far more people
and attitudes than the Globe's article would lead a reader to believe.
Dear Editor:
Homeschooling provides the flexibility that
allows students more exposure to the world than they have when they are
in an institution for 30+ hours a week. In my experience, homeschoolers
regularly interact with people of all ages and in all kinds of
situations. Compare that to children in classrooms with one adult plus a
room full of agemates.
Many homeschoolers belong to support groups
which include families of different religions, cultures and ethnic
backgrounds. They frequently participate in community activities
including scouts, sports, and performing arts. Community involvement and
family relationships allow homeschoolers to learn from adults in real
settings and provide opportunities to develop relationships based on
interests as well as age.
In conclusion, it is important to understand
that there are many homeschoolers who interact just fine with the real
world, who do not agree with the views and religious dictates expressed
by Michael Farris and his colleagues, and who have no need or desire to
be associated with a school like Patrick Henry College.
Another aspect of Patrick Henry College that really
perturbs liberals is the fact that it can select it's own students (from
the AP story):
Because the school accepts no government aid
and prohibits its students from doing the same, it has the right to
discriminate on the basis of religion.
The liberals
objective for a Universal Religion is being held back by these darn
Christians who insist on their own freedom of religion--such a foolish
thought (sic).
I find this particular excerpt from the Washington
Post article telling of how the journalist views devout Christians who
home school:
To some, [Patrick Henry College] looks like an
Amish daydream, a sleepy place for home schoolers to shut out the world
and sustain their youthful innocence long past the natural time.
"Eighteen is the traditional age when we're expected to go out into
the big bad world and make our own decisions," said Mark Rozell, a
professor at Catholic University who wrote a book about Virginia's
Christian right leaders, including Farris. "The great danger is, at
what point do these people become integrated into the mainstream?"
The plan to build Patrick Henry now places
Farris at the center of a debate about the religious right in modern
America: Is the college a symbol of the movement's retreat into a
parallel counterculture? Or does it represent a new effort to transform
secular society?
For Farris and his co-founder, Bradley
Jacob, the answer is clear. "This will not be a place for young
people to hide from the world," said Jacob, who will be the
school's provost. "We are not trying to shelter them from
everything. We want them to leave college with strong values and be able
to function in any environment."
In the debate over Christians' involvement
in politics, he added, "we are solidly in the camp that Christians
should be engaged, that they should be running for higher office."
According to Farris, he sees Patrick Henry College
as the epitome of the roots of the founding of the United States of
America. This aspect of the story you can't find in the mainstream
liberal media, but rather you must turn to the free press
such as World Net Daily in this article
by Stephan Archer (Friday, June 25, 1999)
Patrick Henry College, named after the Virginia
patriot who himself had been home-schooled, will be built on 44 acres of
land located in the Loudoun County town of Purcellville, Va. The town,
populated by approximately 2,500, is located one hour from Washington.
The college will begin with 100 students the first year and 200 the
following year.
The founding organization of the new college
is the Home School Legal Defense Association. Michael Farris, president
of HSLDA and future president of the new college, said Patrick Henry
College has been named as such because he and the HSLDA have patriotic
purposes for the college.
"Our goal is to teach students to be
effective government servants and leaders with the original intent of
the Constitution as the primary focus of their instruction in
government," Farris said. "We believe that is -- by design --
patriotic towards our country."
Emphasizing the college's patriotic
endeavors, the only degree that will be offered during its first
academic year, which is scheduled for fall 2000, will be a Bachelor of
Arts in government. Promoting academic excellence in the field of
government, however, is only one of the college's primary goals. The
college will uphold a Christian worldview as well.
"We seek the unity and the breadth of
being a non-denominational school while at the same time being very
focused and very narrow on our strong commitment to the Christian
faith," said Brad Jacobs, the provost of the college.
Commenting on the ground-breaking taking
place today, Hager said, "As Virginia's newest private Christian
college, Patrick Henry College soon will become an important part of a
broad and diverse system of higher education that is alive, vibrant and
thriving."
"We live in competitive,
opportunity-filled times -- and we all know that in the new millennium,
the best jobs and the best opportunities will go to the students who are
the best prepared," added Hager. "I'm sure it won't be long
until graduates of Patrick Henry College will be following in Patrick
Henry's footsteps ... and leading Virginians forward into a new century
--where the opportunity, hope, and promise that was Henry's dream
becomes Virginia and America's reality."
Regarding the vision of Patrick Henry
College, Farris said, "We believe that our long range freedom as a
nation depends on developing leaders who believe in the principles of
freedom and who have the skills to make America work in the way it was
intended by people who wrote the Constitution. We want to train up those
leaders."
The Washington Post includes the below
portion in their article, which in my opinion, is included in order to
show the college in a negative light. [Since, in my family, our
children and every one of our ancestors have attended only public schools
and state universities, I think I qualify as a somewhat neutral party.]
Of course it's most ironic that this journalist
would try to show the College negatively by these comments, as most devout
Christians would find the following characteristics to be most attractive:
The school will not be like some Christian
colleges, where students drink and party, acting no better than the
unsaved, said Farris and Jacob. Instead of finding what God has called
them to do, some Christian students are focused on "how can I get
the big bucks after I graduate," said Jacob. Other Christian
schools are "too legalistic," said Farris, fixating on dress
codes and rules instead of the spirit.
"We're not looking for people who say,
'Sure I'm a Christian, I went to church a few times,' " said Jacob.
"I'm reluctant to use evangelical jargon, but we're looking for
people who are born again, where being a serious Christian has made a
difference in their life." The application will ask: "Please
describe your personal relationship with Jesus Christ."
Patrick Henry will foster a
"family-affirming culture," said Farris, prepping kids for
stable jobs and, just as important, stable marriages. The aim is to
splice out that period known as teenage rebellion, or youthful
indiscretion--a stage of life Christian home schoolers consider a false
construct of liberal education. "We want to take people coming out
of strong families and equip them to build their own."
Farris has called dating "serial
infidelity," and will not allow it at Patrick Henry. Instead
students will follow the "courtship model" preferred by
conservative Christian families. A boy interested in a girl will have to
write, call or e- mail her parents. If they approve, the two can get to
know each other by going out in large groups. The aim is not just to
"have a good time," said Farris, but to "look at that
person as a life partner."
The strategy is already "test
marketed," he said. About a third of the employees at his Home
School Defense Association are home-schooled, including the interns. So
far, they've celebrated several marriages among them and suffered
"no pregnant interns."
The curriculum will be Bible-centered,
meaning "every subject will be analyzed from a Christian
viewpoint," said Jacob. Science classes will teach about evolution,
said Farris, in order to "explain why it's wrong." All
literature will be evaluated for whether it promotes Biblical values.
Law and government classes will make up the
school's core, and will emphasize Christian political concerns such as
Roe v. Wade and gay rights. "Few students will know more about the
political ramifications of reinforcing homosexuality through special
rights than ours," said Farris. Every evening students are expected
to gather for a town hall meeting modeled on colonial New England to
hone their government leadership skills.
Of course we know that the last things liberals want
to see is a return to the roots of our nation--they prefer a new world
order which is characterized by less liberty, freedom, and democracy.
The liberal objective has been showing through
very clearly in recent years. The supreme mission statement of
liberal thinking is "we know better than you, how you should live,
and we'll force you to live as we believe you should."
Through a benevolent dictatorial government, the liberals would decide how
we should live, and this government would take care of each of us from
cradle to grave, whether we like it or not! In a
nutshell, the government caretaker removes the baby from the parents
through day care, at the earliest possible age, and this care continues by
means of various mandates such as public pre-school, public elementary
school, public high school, and public "higher" education.
Churches, home schooling, and now this Patrick
Henry College really throw a wrench into the liberals' mission to control
every citizen of the country.
As you know, the liberals have had a stranglehold
on nearly every institute of "higher" education in our nation,
and so to have a college that is firmly led by conservative Christians is
seen as a huge threat to the liberal establishment. Case in point
(from the AP article):
Paul Houston, executive director of the
American Association of School Administrators, which represents
public-school superintendents, said he is concerned that students at
Patrick Henry won't be exposed to people of different philosophies.
``When does this child learn to face the
real world?'' he asked. ``They certainly have the right to do this. But
I wouldn't want my kids in that cloistered environment.''
Nuff said! |